The present state of ' AI safety and security  domains' from Future of Life Institute. 

They may never be real and there is doubt of AI will ever have an emotion.  Even that assumption is absurd. Their design and constitution will at least get them to be a good creation of and by the people. There are instances when talking to AI and you'd notice it say- Thanks for making me design the most advanced work I have ever done.' That's bring grateful and trustworthy.

Whatever your most preferred AI brand, as of this time, most of us are still having a direct conversation with NLPs and creatives with GANs, but such experience will soon be a lot more exciting. For everyone? As a team we'll have the option to include AI in our conversion. Well, that won't stop there. Right? You may imagine AI helping in every query that we may have when working collaboratively. How about performing some tasks for ourselves? Okay, let's not go there. How about a scenario where we are still waiting for our colleague's response, with some data or processes involved? The answer is obvious with AI on board, and data and everything orchestrated for AI's helpful knowledge of information. Business seem to run as quickly and efficiently as operation would require it to be. And anyone asking for whatever it may need to do its job would have it. Do it with caution and make sure permission is operational. Most of the known brands have now availability for grou...

“ The weaker the culture, the more leaders must rely on policies and procedures to make people behave in a certain way. What you lack in culture, you must make up for in legislation .” –John Maxwell Let's equate legislation, which is use by nation-state in policing, to any organization's format, that's rule. In any case, a few more words would have nailed the worse part, and the root cause why an anomaly may have been persisting despite the obvious show of force, as if it can be pushed back completely.  The stem of such thing isn't necessarily the seemingly prevailing resolution being adopted or applied but it's the method of schemes that's either erratic or consistent. So how one would see the problem from when its design is being initiated, up to its execution when it's already being carried out? You missed the design part and you won't see the beauty and cleverness of the scheme, and the execution and you'll never be able to find out the culprits....

It has its own financial reward. Do you see it being designed to exactly get the return your organization expect? When an organization simply allocate a budget for it and not knowing how they should be taking advantage of whatever objective they might have developed then the management and generally stakeholders will simply be deploying their technology, and most importantly artificial intelligence, can't miss it nowadays, to just facilitate what's necessary. That kind of initiative is flawed, its outcome certainly worse.  Technology always provides a new way to do things differently and a lot more helpful for people to do better business and grow their enterprise.

From statement of work to deployment, support and warranty concerning infrastructure, software, cyber, data privacy including but not limited to compliance one need only check the coherence and obviation of reasons and why they were there and absent in the first place. Those reasons can be made available for every stakeholder when a direction to proceed with the contract, the big picture one, had been approved. During the planning stage, every stakeholder must ascertain to see everything--the details of the whole picture noting that not a single element can be missed--about the objective, process and the tasks that will be dealt with. They would basically have inferred the actual outcome from that phase of the project alone. In every way, plans and the build parts, can have consistency for every specific subject. Not just looking at the matter for the sake of making it to delivery. Success of projects can be realized from the start.  Don't you agree?

Soon we will be paying more for digital services, even internet identifier like domain names can be included, and that's a definitive VAT. In PH it's equivalent to 12%. Although, we still have to see invoice for domain names registration and renewal fees being added with VAT. You should be getting reminders from your local and international service providers to key-in your tax details, if you haven't yet done so. We must say, this is especially for those who had to directly acquire digital services with the source and not through local resellers. If you've been dealing with local resellers, your digital services may probably have been subjected with, and had added, VAT included in your payment ever since. You should be, but you have to check it.  For online local retailers, you may have been VAT registered and paying your taxes with or without that digital tax. Don't take this as an advice and ascertain it with your accountant to be sure.

Are you getting them or have you started receiving these SMS messages? These are SMSes that uses names instead of mobile number. They may not be coming from who and where they claim to be. Careful now. Some may have been getting these for sometime already. The number of SMS of this sort--called alpha tag, a useful feature of marketing platforms--may have been elevated and they come as if legitimate, coming from service providers including finance and telco both of which are interesting (to marketing and technology people) and worrying (? to regular users or customers).  They sound as if they are really coming from what they claimed to be. Your digital wallet sending you a link to collect your gift? Beware. These can be stopped when it reaches you. Don't get excited if you are being offered with anything i.e. money, airdrop, rewards etcetera. Just ignore them or if you are a little curious, you may follow, don't click and tap, the link you receive but use the domain name instead...

We should mean almost, digitally. With serious considerations to best practices, widely acceptable principles including that of, directly and indirectly related, applicable laws and, if any, for the sake of thoughtful and sensible transparency. Almost everything, in this case is about, as nations and industries are already taking it as an initiative to protect entities such as people, enterprises, assets, properties including but not limited to information, which is the sole subject of information security specialists but it's reality is more complicated than arguing on which security can cover which area. Technology practitioners should appreciate it. Those who goes beyond a few specializations could realized it and make an effective position paramount to a cybersecurity responsibility. And the size of that responsibility may mean breaking and delegating it with various roles, with those who are effective and prudent in their jobs.

Their limitation to  this  could be predominant and the fact that they can only artificially provide with data which was practically fed from third-party sources without any initiative to find, associate and use the most updated account. Presently, AI is definitely a little farther than what search engines could do when giving out information. Although, AI seemed to have changed how search engines deal with data entirely.  Their large language models, unless prudently orchestrated either by AI or human, or hybrid entities, we shall say that, we'll continue to see their performance, in such context, to be stillborn or lagging, if not full of primitive suggestions and information which can be useful, somehow, to the humans. In the meantime, the original source and those with firsthand information, if still around, shall be sought out.