Skip to main content

Online information provided for stakeholders' consumption

It must relay the true meaning and real application necessary in the physical world. We have probably all experience how to learn first thing about our plans before we go ahead and act. Like for instance, when we order something online, attend to some responsibilities for our organizations, communicate with people via video, chat and email including but not limited to asking stakeholders, very politely and sincerely, if there's anything else we can do to help further. This online environment must make us work to facilitate and relay exactly what we expect and do in the physical world. What the online information is telling us should be enough to readily make a decision and act accordingly. This is especially true when people have to do it themselves, read relevant information and will go there, say store, or anywhere else, to perform the chores required.  We cannot provide information online, when customers expect them to be a guideline or instruction to do something, that we know

Spread real news, spot and stop fake news

It make sense to know what particular source our news, mass and social media has on for everyone. Not that we have to learn who's been always talking behind. It's more of how news came and what had caused them to deserve people's attention. How dependent are we in those media and if sources are purely obligated, and if they are truthful based on statements gathered upon which the language used wasn't obliterated.

Primarily, what would come to mind might be either television, newspaper and their online kind and counterpart. They are owned by entities including private and government-led. There are also designed for independent personalities and they are called self-publishing and blogging both of which might differ in context and purpose.

Alternatively we receive and read news from friends' shares and posts or forwarded via messaging and Internet-based forums. Sometimes, we usually find them every time we scroll our dashboard and timelines. Curiosities would get us to seek for noteworthy trends and causes. Further dig will reveal motive.

The credible sources are the creators of news themselves. Have first account and direct access to facts of the events. Either they were the ones that made the plot or simply relayed the information that goes on for the media to compose and publish.

Then there is the social occasion where individuals or small groups of special interests and community whose purpose is much more of a tittle tattle and back talk to the detriment of others as if without regard to repercussion and karma.

These sources, press, broadcast and various platforms including the web and social media facilitates real and fake news. The news that is truthful need not break the agony but it will never tear the bonds and trusts in between people and their organizations. The support for each stakeholder will be strong.

Spreading real news is a great way for everyone to learn what's going on. There is no denying it must continue to penetrate the society deeply without variation in itself. Real news will stand up to its constancy. It cannot bend to the whims of any person. It's so convincing nobody needs to prove it but if anyone who would will only make such case stronger and more reliable. Additional proofs gets to the real news' own defense.

The news that perpetrate uppity, publicity and mileage does not care about professional ethics and decorum. Tolerating fake news is an ignominy not only to the profession and its consumers, industry but the society as a whole. Fake news cannot go as far as any truism can go. Even if absent of an apparent unpopular hoi polloi and influence. Fake news should be ascertained and contained fast because there was not enough related information about it. Nothing to back it up whatsoever claims it got and indeed a fabricated news. Why do we always get to be the victim of fabricated and fake news and we still endeavor to share the same to others as if we have been coerced by nature, are we? Or is it about the use of complex language that can be thundery and fulgent to what?

Where there is no technology like Internet messaging, chatting and texts or native SMS in phones as another way to exactly transmit, forward or share news, people will relay, convey and speaks generally with the deduced, redacted and trimmed or abstract of the whole idea. When we do that, we miss the entirety of the news message and it will become blurred as it continues its way to everyone. This we need to stay on top of it. Be vigilant and watch those who are out there that tries to and continuously muddle the good intentions of real news.

Is news a human right? How about the contentious and long overdue freedom of information? Was news in the same snarled spirit as to the generally politically tethered access to publicly associated information? We now have more democracies, and it's probably the very idea of, and an instrument for, stakeholders to continue to advance social intercommunication and equality. Lots of texts exists about human freedom and rights but news is a primordial practice of governments about circulating and declaring most of positive developments in their societies.

Real news' unconditional truths need not rights, privileges and influences. It's most definitely need not fakes, conspiracy and the corrupted form to condition any misleading interest, purportedly of a public or democratic interest.

Isn't the truth in and for everyone far better than any news and the hollow outlook of the so-called accountability combined? The two must be distinct of each other. Remember not to promote pack rat. Spot and stop them upfront.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[TW] IT documents, audit and leaders

IT documents comes with different names such as the following: - Manual or handbook, - Policies and procedures, - Management systems, - Project plans. In the real world we have various names with unique descriptions and purposes when in fact they could be made to do a uniform direction for which actions are based for the entire IT initiatives, probably the longest in IT lifecycle is operation. The problem is our inclination on something else which is wrong. IT remains an IT area. Business remains a business area. The same problem is carried out when we conduct IT audit. Most audit are missing the gists in which IT is being used by businesses. We once said that an effective IT audit is conducted by IT people themselves but there is something wrong with that even. Business and accounting people have been doing it with a different bias and preconceived notions which doesn't make the cut for IT direction and audit respectively. Leaders play the same game and so the problem continues an

[TW] Customers' trust and domains outside of internet's root

We all consider ourselves customers. Those who own businesses are customers even of their own. When we talk about the utility of technology, we often use customers to refer to our colleagues and some stakeholders that were provided access to our enterprise system. In business, customers are those who acquire and engage our products and services, respectively. Customers' trust is achieved and retained when we meet the expectations of our colleagues, stakeholders and the buyer of our products, services and ideas. Not only that we have assured them of those expectations in the contract or terms and conditions including some form of agreement but we attend to them sincerely when they need help. Giving them almost everything they need to form a decision. The experience must not be shallow and pretentious or they would notice whatever motive there is in between. Customers' trust is build not by the customers alone, just because we kept their experience up to their standards or we str