It must relay the true meaning and real application necessary in the physical world. We have probably all experience how to learn first thing about our plans before we go ahead and act. Like for instance, when we order something online, attend to some responsibilities for our organizations, communicate with people via video, chat and email including but not limited to asking stakeholders, very politely and sincerely, if there's anything else we can do to help further. This online environment must make us work to facilitate and relay exactly what we expect and do in the physical world. What the online information is telling us should be enough to readily make a decision and act accordingly. This is especially true when people have to do it themselves, read relevant information and will go there, say store, or anywhere else, to perform the chores required. We cannot provide information online, when customers expect them to be a guideline or instruction to do something, that we know
Why is it that we always place regulation as a responsibility, most primarily, of governments?
We think self-regulation has been of human's mode since the beginning of time, and entities working on advance technology or in the case of AIs, that without the usual apparent oversight, shall know their own work better and its effect and implications, if any, more than anybody else.
Did we always say, honesty is the best policy? In AI self-regulation, whether it's done by the AI enterprise itself or within its industry, that will be definitively brooding.
What do you think? (We will update this shortly but you can comment now.)
Comments