We should mean almost, digitally. With serious considerations to best practices, widely acceptable principles including that of, directly and indirectly related, applicable laws and, if any, for the sake of thoughtful and sensible transparency. Almost everything, in this case is about, as nations and industries are already taking it as an initiative to protect entities such as people, enterprises, assets, properties including but not limited to information, which is the sole subject of information security specialists but it's reality is more complicated than arguing on which security can cover which area. Technology practitioners should appreciate it. Those who goes beyond a few specializations could realized it and make an effective position paramount to a cybersecurity responsibility. And the size of that responsibility may mean breaking and delegating it with various roles, with those who are effective and prudent in their jobs.
Everything that technology does cannot be fathomable, say the entirety of such in an organization's initiative, without the how.
It demonstrates, either technology has a good start, is made effective or bad including the following:
1. Leadership,
2. Design,
3. Operation,
4. Personnel.
Regardless where the technology is being utilized for the organization and its stakeholders, the how can tell what's going on and may happen. Technology here may include business and industrial applications, security including but not limited to the infrastructure and the data production that are involved.
The how is not a panacea but it can be used to determine whether or not a certain organization has done and even formalize an acceptable job with its technology to help run various, if not all, business processes.
Comments