Skip to main content

Cybersecurity sees everything

We should mean almost, digitally. With serious considerations to best practices, widely acceptable principles including that of, directly and indirectly related, applicable laws and, if any, for the sake of thoughtful and sensible transparency. Almost everything, in this case is about, as nations and industries are already taking it as an initiative to protect entities such as people, enterprises, assets, properties including but not limited to information, which is the sole subject of information security specialists but it's reality is more complicated than arguing on which security can cover which area. Technology practitioners should appreciate it. Those who goes beyond a few specializations could realized it and make an effective position paramount to a cybersecurity responsibility. And the size of that responsibility may mean breaking and delegating it with various roles, with those who are effective and prudent in their jobs.

Enterprise technology's juxtaposition, complementarity and application

The ability to see within an enterprise with operations requiring various technologies in information, communication, operational, security and compliance, or two or more of these, finds stakeholders, or the need to adjust techniques and make, some ingenious ways to be more effective in their responsibilities and deliverables or production.

Enterprise technology is not an area and language to be used where there are only some specializations involved but which still within the confines of information technology.

IT may have been serving utility operations or energy generation for sometime already and yet stakeholders cannot see how to work hand-in-hand to increase their own efficiency, and the output for which customers are very dependent. There are efforts but they remain completely separate and the result is the bigger realizations and concerns about costs rather than creation of value from the start, not just when profits began to come in.

If IT is not clearly use in such environment because of the limitations when defining organization or stakeholders' language in their technology efforts or due to some industry practices, somebody can take some notes and reflect on their related activity including increasing acquisition of technology features, one that can no longer be avoided includes digitalized applications and Internet of Things. How much more for the specific application intended for actuators, valves, transport signalling and even measuring their performance?

In fact, it is happening everywhere and those that cannot be missed are in manufacturing, factory, healthcare, homes etcetera.

Heard of mission critical services? The definition is again have to be clear without the need to bring for the differences of understanding for the court of law to decide or clarify for such a trouble. The rule-maker can do better than simply repeating the language of the main document which can be called policy. Within governments, there are called lawmakers who make the main document while the rule-makers must elaborate for the purpose of every provisions for which it will have to be adopted and enforced.

One thing very obvious is technology and policy. When an organization cannot apply policy language to their technology applications they are not taking advantage of the many benefits their stakeholders' may make. It makes both technology and policy people not making lives easier but harder, and it can go beyond their organization. Such practices may be picked up as a good thing because it's working for them but still that's making technology to do harder. It must be the opposite, everytime a new technology is being applied. The default for technology to do it harder is no longer the case, long before we've realized it, now and the future. It must change how things are being done or artificial intelligence will take over such roles and these people will even be in a more precarious situation. If AI gets in the way when people should have been doing it, the trouble is there in history already, from those who has experienced being taken out of a job because it doesn't know how to use the new technology. Utilizing and using a technology is easy, just a little time and practice to be in the productive state.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jobs we observed in a system performance

They are made either any of the following- - Tech job, - Business job, - Nut job, or - Enterprise job. What's yours? Can you do it better from your existing drive? Whatever you do, your output should facilitate not just your organization's goal but a little more than what you originally planned. Leaders usually kept them in the mind, so subtle only them knows it, but with some useful and delicate strategies employed people really are doing a good job, and working to improve them, too. That's the beginning why corporate social responsibility, or even the consequential environmental, social and governance initiatives can be a potent move to do something, if pertinent or weighty is even the right word. That doesn't need an ostentatious resources but the effect is meaningful for stakeholders, everyone we meant.

iclassed privacy policy, unbelievable at first sight

Those who, before engaging us and was reading our business conduct, alerts and notices , could not restrain themselves asking, "can you really do your job without keeping any data at all? At the end of the day, you should still be looking at those information and make sure you did, and will, do well. I am expecting a lot from you here, you said so yourself!" Now, that last sentence is so loud. We keep them, not in our premises, but yours. If you've been our clients, you'll know how persistent we are when it comes to the reliability and security of your systems, data and credentials. That's our responsibility, as is made popular by cloud computing, and we don't need to be in a cloud.

How to save from Microsoft 365 or Teams and learn the basics of the solution from our first license and transaction

 Subscription and license fees for cloud services is not always appealing to small businesses. For big businesses, we are on a spending spree because we simply can, even if a license if not being used purposely and productively. With small businesses, no matter the need for Microsoft 365, we won't even try it. We did try but stopped and never subscribed back again. We consider the cost to be very high not just because of the service or product's license cost only. If accumulated for years compared to simply buying physical media, which is still the best bet. This, however, is going away. For some markets, it is not available anymore. How can a business get Microsoft 365 without breaking the planned budget allocation just for this service? There are options available from Microsoft 365 website. Pick the business, not family, personal or enterprise, which we may want to consider as well. With the cost the only consideration, any of this may not be a good choice. But then some fea...