Our title is itself a book's and the first sentence, see that after the comma, is in its front flap by journalist Scott Rosenberg. Let's take some more words from it and share here. Blogging brought the Web's native character into focus---convivial, expressive, democratic. Bloggers have become the curators of our collective experience, testing out their ideas in front of a crowd and linking people in ways that broadcasts can't match. Blogs have created a new kind of public sphere--one in which we can think out loud together. The preceding paragraph is all in the book flap, front and back. It is the simplest answer if somebody is asking what a blog is, then and now. Although we see that as the magnanimous purpose of a blog which is really enticing and challenging. It adds choices and rooms for both sources and audiences without the regular prescriptive cadence. What's common is the responsibility. Whether or not we do it via blog, print and online news, and whoever
What do organization's expect in this technological context of theirs?
It should always be quality, utility and safety:
> Quality, meant a lot of things in an organization. They don't have time to mince words and align quality measures only with a very specific area. Theirs is quality and they meant to address the entire organizational goal. Owners and senior management knows and can assimilate realities. No less.
> Utility, is not only about functionality. They need operational reliability and at the same it is something that doesn't sacrifice stakeholders' temperament, productivity and expectations. And
> Safety (and security), is to protect both systems and data. Resilient to incidents and human errors. No excuses.
How many human resources do you need to effectively and efficiently tackle these varying expanses, as shown in the image above? Have you been reciprocating and interchanging people with technology and there exists still that huge inconsistency and inconceivability of good outcome?
If you are not certain, it's a problem.
Don't be like this: Many people take no care of their money until they come nearly to the end of it and others do just the same with their time. --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Time is limited even when finances aren't. We can help.
> Quality, meant a lot of things in an organization. They don't have time to mince words and align quality measures only with a very specific area. Theirs is quality and they meant to address the entire organizational goal. Owners and senior management knows and can assimilate realities. No less.
> Utility, is not only about functionality. They need operational reliability and at the same it is something that doesn't sacrifice stakeholders' temperament, productivity and expectations. And
> Safety (and security), is to protect both systems and data. Resilient to incidents and human errors. No excuses.
How many human resources do you need to effectively and efficiently tackle these varying expanses, as shown in the image above? Have you been reciprocating and interchanging people with technology and there exists still that huge inconsistency and inconceivability of good outcome?
If you are not certain, it's a problem.
Don't be like this: Many people take no care of their money until they come nearly to the end of it and others do just the same with their time. --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Time is limited even when finances aren't. We can help.
Comments