Their limitation to this could be predominant and the fact that they can only artificially provide with data which was practically fed from third-party sources without any initiative to find, associate and use the most updated account. Presently, AI is definitely a little farther than what search engines could do when giving out information. Although, AI seemed to have changed how search engines deal with data entirely. Their large language models, unless prudently orchestrated either by AI or human, or hybrid entities, we shall say that, we'll continue to see their performance, in such context, to be stillborn or lagging, if not full of primitive suggestions and information which can be useful, somehow, to the humans. In the meantime, the original source and those with firsthand information, if still around, shall be sought out.
Following few statements about what the bill is by the authors. Since the Internet is of global in nature, a legislation that address global cyber crime may be needed. Also, maybe it can do good for all.
“Cybercrime must be a top priority for our national security,” Gillibrand said in a joint statement with Hatch. “If we’re going to protect our networks, our infrastructure, our economy and our families, we have to go after cyber criminals wherever they may be — and it must be an international effort."
“Cybercrime is a serious threat to the security of the global economy, which is why we need to coordinate our fight worldwide. Until countries begin to take the necessary steps to fight criminals within their borders, cybercrime havens will continue to flourish,” Hatch said.
One of the authors have reported how much New York businesses are losing because of cybercrime.
The U.S. law would be called, International Cybercrime Reporting and Cooperation Act.
In fact, prior to this law, there have been international efforts (e.g. draft and study) that addresses global cybercrime:
- The ITU toolkit for cybercrime legislation;
- The COE's project on cybercrime.
Council of Europe (COE) has also profiled how countries are doing with regards to their national legislation in cybercrime.
“Cybercrime must be a top priority for our national security,” Gillibrand said in a joint statement with Hatch. “If we’re going to protect our networks, our infrastructure, our economy and our families, we have to go after cyber criminals wherever they may be — and it must be an international effort."
“Cybercrime is a serious threat to the security of the global economy, which is why we need to coordinate our fight worldwide. Until countries begin to take the necessary steps to fight criminals within their borders, cybercrime havens will continue to flourish,” Hatch said.
One of the authors have reported how much New York businesses are losing because of cybercrime.
The U.S. law would be called, International Cybercrime Reporting and Cooperation Act.
In fact, prior to this law, there have been international efforts (e.g. draft and study) that addresses global cybercrime:
- The ITU toolkit for cybercrime legislation;
- The COE's project on cybercrime.
Council of Europe (COE) has also profiled how countries are doing with regards to their national legislation in cybercrime.
Comments