We should mean almost, digitally. With serious considerations to best practices, widely acceptable principles including that of, directly and indirectly related, applicable laws and, if any, for the sake of thoughtful and sensible transparency. Almost everything, in this case is about, as nations and industries are already taking it as an initiative to protect entities such as people, enterprises, assets, properties including but not limited to information, which is the sole subject of information security specialists but it's reality is more complicated than arguing on which security can cover which area. Technology practitioners should appreciate it. Those who goes beyond a few specializations could realized it and make an effective position paramount to a cybersecurity responsibility. And the size of that responsibility may mean breaking and delegating it with various roles, with those who are effective and prudent in their jobs.
Following few statements about what the bill is by the authors. Since the Internet is of global in nature, a legislation that address global cyber crime may be needed. Also, maybe it can do good for all.
“Cybercrime must be a top priority for our national security,” Gillibrand said in a joint statement with Hatch. “If we’re going to protect our networks, our infrastructure, our economy and our families, we have to go after cyber criminals wherever they may be — and it must be an international effort."
“Cybercrime is a serious threat to the security of the global economy, which is why we need to coordinate our fight worldwide. Until countries begin to take the necessary steps to fight criminals within their borders, cybercrime havens will continue to flourish,” Hatch said.
One of the authors have reported how much New York businesses are losing because of cybercrime.
The U.S. law would be called, International Cybercrime Reporting and Cooperation Act.
In fact, prior to this law, there have been international efforts (e.g. draft and study) that addresses global cybercrime:
- The ITU toolkit for cybercrime legislation;
- The COE's project on cybercrime.
Council of Europe (COE) has also profiled how countries are doing with regards to their national legislation in cybercrime.
“Cybercrime must be a top priority for our national security,” Gillibrand said in a joint statement with Hatch. “If we’re going to protect our networks, our infrastructure, our economy and our families, we have to go after cyber criminals wherever they may be — and it must be an international effort."
“Cybercrime is a serious threat to the security of the global economy, which is why we need to coordinate our fight worldwide. Until countries begin to take the necessary steps to fight criminals within their borders, cybercrime havens will continue to flourish,” Hatch said.
One of the authors have reported how much New York businesses are losing because of cybercrime.
The U.S. law would be called, International Cybercrime Reporting and Cooperation Act.
In fact, prior to this law, there have been international efforts (e.g. draft and study) that addresses global cybercrime:
- The ITU toolkit for cybercrime legislation;
- The COE's project on cybercrime.
Council of Europe (COE) has also profiled how countries are doing with regards to their national legislation in cybercrime.
Comments